top of page

RELEVANT STATISTICS

1. DIABETES
  - As of 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that approximately [38 million] Americans are living with diabetes. [ 90% to 95% ] use portables and sensors to manage their glucose.

 

2. CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
  - The American Heart Association states that cardiovascular diseases (CVD) affect [121 million ] of the U.S. population.
  - [X%] of CVD patients are participating in remote patient monitoring programs to enhance their overall cardiovascular health (Reference: heart.gov).

​

3. RENAL DISEASES
  - The National Kidney Foundation estimates that [15 million] Americans have chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  - [1 to 5%] of CKD patients are utilizing remote patient monitoring technologies to track and manage their renal health.

 

​

OVERALL TRENDS: 
 

Remote patient monitoring has shown a consistent rise across various chronic conditions, offering patients real-time data and healthcare professionals valuable insights. The adoption of telehealth and remote monitoring has notably increased, especially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

​

These statistics underscore the growing reliance on remote patient monitoring technologies among individuals managing diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and renal conditions. For the most up-to-date and specific data, please refer to the latest reports and publications from reputable health organizations and government agencies at HHS.gov. 

​

A 2021 study from Mayo Clinic revealed that COVID-19 patients participating in an RPHM program experienced fewer ER visits and hospitalizations. Within 30 days of enrollment, there were nearly 11.4% ER visits, 9.4% hospitalizations, and 0.4% fatalities.

​

It's important to note that the effectiveness of patient health monitoring may vary from person to person, and its success also depends on factors such as patient engagement, compliance, and the quality of the remote monitoring system in use. Furthermore, RPHM should always be integrated into a comprehensive healthcare approach, with regular communication between patients and healthcare providers. Research conducted by the Mayo Clinic, the American Medical Association (AMA), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) demonstrates a positive impact of Remote Patient Health Monitoring (RPM) on patients with chronic conditions.

​

Emerging research underscores the profound potential of Remote Patient Monitoring in effecting remarkable reductions in both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when compared with customary care and standalone self-monitoring. Direct comparisons against conventional care consistently manifest noteworthy average decreases in both SBP and DBP through the implementation of RPM. Within comprehensive three-way analyses, albeit solitary self-monitoring exhibits modestly favorable effects on blood pressure regulation vis-à-vis standard care, the synergistic integration of RPM unveils a substantially more pronounced influence on SBP and DBP compared to self-monitoring in isolation. Furthermore, supplementary investigations accentuate that the salutary impact of RHPM on SBP could potentially attain greater ascendancy with prolonged intervention durations and the assimilation of multifaceted behavior modification modalities.

Ref: American Heart Association & Hypertension 

According to a study in the American Heart Association Hypertension Journal, individuals engaged in a pharmacist-led telemonitoring initiative for hypertension control experienced roughly 50% fewer cardiovascular events than those undergoing standard office-based monitoring. The study encompassed 450 individuals with uncontrolled high blood pressure from 16 clinics in Minnesota. Through random assignment, participants were divided into two groups. Following six months of remote monitoring guided by pharmacists via phone, using at-home monitors, participants maintained lower blood pressure levels over a two-year period compared to the group receiving regular care from their primary physicians. After five years, the remote care group exhibited a 5.3% incidence of heart attacks, strokes, stent placements, or heart failure hospitalizations, in contrast to 10.4% for the routine care group.

ANALYSIS OF PATIENT PROGRESS DATA BEYOND THE INITIAL 180 DAYS.

diabetes
A1c: -3%

systolic
- 4.7mmHg 

diastolic
-3.5 mmHg 

weight
-8.2lbs

better adherence to medication
+89%

Reference: 

J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25: e45033.

Published online 2023 Aug 22. doi: 10.2196/45033

Real-World Adherence and Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring Among Medicaid Patients With Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study

stats diabetics on RPM.jpg
stats 2 diabetes on RPM.jpg
stats 3 diabetes on RPM.jpg

Reference: 

JACC Journals › JACC › Archives › Vol. 77 No. 18_Supplement_1

​

USE OF REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING TO IMPROVE HYPERTENSION CONTROL RATES IN A HIGH RISK PATIENT POPULATIONOPEN ACCESS

​

​

​

Charts of Hypertensive patients outcome on RPM.jpg
bottom of page